Saratoga poet Marilyn McCabe has sent, via a friend, her poem inspired by Balazs Gardi's 2007 image of a man holding a wounded boy in the Korengal Valley in East Afghanistan. Nearly everyone who commented on this image compared it to some masterpiece of painting or sculpture, by Michelangelo, by Caravaggio, by Rembrandt, by El Greco, or just generally from the grand tradition of western art. Photojournalists and documentary photographers have long winced at the suggestion their work "looks like a painting," because the essence of documentary photography is that it decidedly is not a painting, meaning it is not manufactured, arranged, distilled, or otherwise interpreted to create or enhance dramatic effect. Traditionally, the first authority of a documentary photograph is precisely its literal truth, the spontaneous representation of reality it certifies and thereby honors.
El Greco, Pieta, 1587-97 |
Eos Lifting the Body of Her Son Memnon, Attic red-figure cup, 490-480 BCE |
Afghan Pieta
Eyes of the one holding the limp body,
the grainy surface as of stone,
or pigment made of rough powder.
The triolet: help sought
from the less of it, bonds
broken, things cut down.
There’s a body.
There’s a body
and there’s life
left, it’s seeping,
wounds we must look for
in tell-tale places.
There’s the cradle:
the holder’s arms,
chest to body.
The ache the eyes
are always turned toward:
the third figure obscure.
The matter is always
man. The suffering
old masters always knew.
--Marilyn McCabe
Balazs Gardi, Afghan man and wounded boy, Korengal Valley, Kunar Province, East Afghanistan, 2007 |
1 comment:
Like you, Tim, I have no doubt about the authenticity of Gardi's photograph - but we can't blame people in 2011 for raising the issue.
Even battle photographs have a long history of being set up (Civil War examples abound). The debate rages on over whether Robert Capa's fallen Spanish soldier was staged, with no apparent clear answer. W. Eugene Smith, himself the author of a famous Pieta-like picture from Minamata, rebelled against his time's strict rules for documentary photography by interpreting available light as "any light that's available."
Not that bouncing a 60-watt bulb of a dirt floor is the equivalent of staging, but it's impossible to satisfy the skeptics' interpretation of "literal truth" in a postmodern world. Stated most simply, all images are fictions - reality does not exist in a frame, in stop-action, or in black and white. Of course, it's the truth behind the image that inspires us, but it is also open to interpretation.
Post a Comment